Pronouns and Leadership: What’s Your Default Leadership Language?
Are you conscious of your default leadership language?
When you present your team’s work, do you think about what your default leadership language is? Do you purposefully choose certain pronouns? Or do you end up presenting your work any old how?
The question was innocuous enough, but the response was telling. “How’s work?”
Typically, I’ll either get a nothing response that suggests that we should find another topic or I’ll get some scoop. Scoop too can take two different paths: Awesome or Awful.
It’s when the scoop comes out that I learn the most about someone’s leadership.
This time I asked and got an earful of awesome. Still, as the story went on, it was clear that one person was more remarkable than the rest: my friend.
Now, I too think that they’re amazing and capable of great things but to listen to them, you’d think that they worked alone. In truth, it was kind of annoying. I had insight into the work they were doing and let me assure you their effort was essential, but not paramount to the contribution of others.
Pronouns and Your Leadership Language
When we talk about ourselves and our colleagues, without giving it much thought, we use pronouns to identify the relevant parties. The pronouns we choose also recognize a contribution and define relationships. It’s our default leadership language that gives the biggest ah-has.
Here’s when I invite you to imagine two scenarios:
- You’re invited into the CEO’s office to present an update – you go alone
- Your team comes with you when you head to the CEO’s office for the update
Is there a difference in your leadership language?
Does it matter if your team is there with you or you’re flying solo?
What if you’re talking about a win vs. a loss? How does your language change?
What leadership language does your boss use as their default?
Do you actively think about your work and career, or just set yourself to default mode? Take the time to think about it with our FREE Career Reflection Worksheet.
“They got it done.”
This leader loves to give credit to the team. In fact, often they’ll take a back seat even when explicitly asked about their contribution. They are humble to the max.
Working for a “They Leader”
Positive: You feel like your contribution is valued and acknowledged.
Negative: Senior leadership may underestimate their contribution and value.
Negative: Especially when things go wrong, “They Leaders” create distance between the leader and the contribution of the team. (It was them, not me)
“I did this”
“I couldn’t have done it without them.”
This leader may or may not realize that their “I” is making the team and their contribution fade into the background. Even when there’s an acknowledgement of the team, the “I Leader” stands as primary in importance and contribution. This leadership language suggests a need to be validated as the hero.
Working for an “I Leader“
Positive: They are often confident and hopefully equally competent.
Positive: When things go wrong, the “I Leader” takes responsibility and also protects the team.
Negative: There’s often limited credit where credit is due, which negatively impacts morale and employee engagement.
“We did this.”
We’re in it together, and everyone’s contribution matters. “We Leaders” don’t hold themselves as above the team but as part of the team.
Working for a “We Leader“
Positive: Team and leader are a single unit, working together.
Negative: In challenging times, some leaders default to “we” to hide or minimize their personal contribution to the team’s struggles.
Negative: Sometimes, the leader’s contribution was worthless, and they use “we” to take credit for success where not much credit is due.
There is not one, perfect, “always use this,” solution to your leadership language when it comes to “I”, “We” or “They”. All have positives and negatives depending on the circumstances. Super insight, right? Not really.
Here’s what matters: The best leaders have self-awareness and are intentional about the words they choose.
Defaults are the problem. An issue? “They” is the go-to. Great success? All “I.” That’s the problem.
Be a person who elevates others and their contributions AND takes responsibility for the way you position yourself too. It’s ok to acknowledge your extraordinary effort, just don’t forget about the others who did outstanding work as well.
Oh, and when the “how’s work?” question isn’t so awesome, and is veering towards the awful, don’t forget to be honest and intentional with your leadership language then too.
Advance your career and reach your full potential with our Leadership Coaching for Women.
Found that interesting?
Learn more about our services
Make your dreams a reality with a professional evaluation of your career to date.
The evidence is in. More women in your company can deliver 35% greater financial returns. (Catalyst)
Linkedin Live on Ageism Friday 24th September 2pm BST with Hung Lee
Join Dorothy Dalton and colleagues - Jo Weech, Head of People, (Exemplary Consultants), Jacob Sten Madsen, Talent Acquisition Advisor (Nielsen) & Anne-Hermine Nicolas, Head of Executive Recruitment (ex-Deloitte), Frank Zupan, Director of Talent Management (Associated Materials) to discuss critical issues in Hung Lee’s Brainfood Live.
Dates for the Diary
September 21st - ENGIE Gender bias in Performance Assessment online
September 24th - Linkedin Live on Ageism with Hung Lee
October 26th - Banque de Luxembourg Préjugés sexistes dans le processus de recrutment.
We have Remote Learning Programs available
Check out our exciting portfolio of offerings to support your business in upskilling and competence building for your teams, to address the unprecedented challenges that women face in this new totally a digital world.
Download and listen free podcasts
As we move slowly out of the pandemic, there is no time like the present to create the best job search ever.
What is the psychology of women taking selfies? Is this really a smart move for professional women? Does a fun activity have a deeper meaning?
Experts say that cyber flashing cases are on the increase, but are largely unreported, either because targets don’t feel the incident is serious enough to flag up or they don’t know what to do about it.