What Do You Know About Digital Harassment? (TFGBV)

Published on: July 30, 2026

By:

What Do You Know About Digital Harassment? (TFGBV)

Harassment Has Changed. Has Your Organisation?

For decades, workplace harassment training has focused on behaviours that occur face-to-face: inappropriate comments, microaggressions,  unwanted touching, bullying, discrimination, and sexual harassment. Although those risks still exist and should not be ignored,  the workplace has changed dramatically, and so has harassment.

Artificial intelligence, social media, and digital communication platforms have created opportunities for innovation and collaboration which we never envisaged ten years ago.  But they have also created entirely new ways to intimidate, humiliate, threaten, and abuse people, particularly women, which we had never even considered either.

Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV) is happening right now, and many organisations are unprepared to recognise it, investigate it, or support those affected and is not something that might happen in the future.

A Growing Workplace Risk

Technology-facilitated abuse includes behaviours such as AI-generated sexual harassment, non-consensual deepfake images and videos, voice cloning, cyberstalking, non-consensual recording, image-based abuse, online impersonation, doxxing, digital coercive control, and the malicious use of workplace technologies.

The rapid growth of generative AI has accelerated these risks  and creating convincing fake images, videos, or audio recordings no longer requires specialist technical knowledge but can be picked up quite easily by anyone with a smart phone or a lap top. An abusive tactic that once took hours or even days to implement, can now be carried out in minutes using freely available tools.

The overwhelming majority of victims are women.

Research from Sensity AI found that around 96% of deepfake videos online are non-consensual pornography, with women making up almost all identified victims. Meanwhile, research from UN Women and UNESCO warns that online gender-based violence is increasing globally as digital technologies become more sophisticated and more accessible.

The impact is not confined to someone’s personal life. Increasingly, these incidents spill directly into the workplace, damaging careers, mental health, and organisational culture.

The Human Cost

Technology-facilitated abuse rarely ends when someone leaves the office. Targets can receive threatening messages throughout the day, have fake images circulated online, be impersonated on social media, or find private information published publicly. Some experience relentless cyberstalking that follows them across multiple platforms.

The impact can be profound:

  • Psychological harm. Targets frequently suffer severe anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a result of the violation of their bodily autonomy.
  • Social and economic damage. Manipulated images are weaponised to harass, blackmail, or humiliate women, sometimes leading to job loss or fractured personal relationships when sent to employers or family members. Many begin avoiding meetings, declining promotions, changing jobs, or leaving the workforce entirely.
  • Loss of digital safety. The ease of creating realistic fake imagery breeds a climate of fear, forcing many women to restrict their public presence and self-expression online. We are already seeing this on LinkedIn where bullying and sexual harassment is rife and AI moderation ineffective and harassment goes unchecked. 

Paula (not her real name) had a digitally altered business photo circulated on social media by a colleague as “a bit of fun.” The outfit she had been wearing had been adjusted to give a “sexy librarian vibe. ” The target, a lady nearing retirement was traumatised and went on sick leave never to return and is taking legal action. Deep fakes are hitting the workplace.

. The CHRO had to ask if this was sexual harassment.  Yes it most certainly is.

These outcomes are not simply wellbeing issues they are psychosocial hazards that directly affect organisational performance, productivity, employee retention, and trust.

Digital Harassment vs In Person Harassment

There is a growing body of research that suggests digital abuse and harassment has a more profound effect on targets thzn in person abuse at the lower end of the scale:

  • Lack of escape: Digital targets report higher mental strain because digital harassment lacks a physical safe haven, allowing abuse to follow victims into their personal time and homes. If the online abuse happens in their personal space then there it is much easier for it to permeate the target’s business life with a direct impact on their ability to work safely because the abuser can’t be intercepted at reception. That gap creates significant organisational risk.  
  • Permanence and scale: Digital messages, emails, and posts provide a permanent record that victims can repeatedly re-read, re-activating their stress response and intensifying psychological trauma compared to transient verbal insults. The abuse can also be scaled at speed and much more widely circulated than any in-person office incident.  
  • Severity ratings: Empirical studies from the University of Sheffield comparing mediums indicate that digital workplace aggression is frequently perceived as more severe and more damaging to overall job satisfaction

Why HR and Leaders Need New Skills

Many HR professionals are highly experienced at investigating traditional workplace complaints but far fewer have received training on:

  • AI-generated sexual harassment
  • Deepfakes, creep shots and synthetic media
  • Doxxing
  • Voice cloning and digital impersonation
  • Preserving digital evidence
  • Online stalking linked to workplace relationships
  • Smart eyewear and covert recording. Cool tech is not so cool for the target.
  • Trauma-informed interviewing following digital abuse

Without this knowledge, organisations risk mishandling disclosures, unintentionally retraumatising victims, or overlooking important evidence.

The Legal Landscape Is Changing

Around the world, legislators are beginning to recognise technology-facilitated abuse as a serious legal issue.

The EU AI Act, expanding online safety legislation in several jurisdictions, stronger protections against image-based abuse, and increasing employer duties around psychosocial safety all point in the same direction: organisations are expected to understand emerging digital risks and respond appropriately.

In addition, standards such as ISO 45003 remind employers that psychological health and safety includes identifying and managing psychosocial hazards, regardless of whether those risks arise from traditional workplace interactions or evolving technologies. Waiting until an incident occurs is no longer a sustainable strategy.

 

Infographic showing psychosocial hazards categorized into organisational, social, and environmental factors.

Prevention Is Better Than Investigation

Many organisations already provide harassment awareness training but few have updated that training to reflect the realities of AI-enabled workplaces. Effective prevention means helping managers and employees understand:

  • how technology-facilitated abuse occurs
  • early warning signs
  • safe reporting procedures
  • trauma-informed responses
  • digital evidence preservation
  • appropriate investigation practices
  • policy updates covering AI misuse, smart eyewear, and digital harassment

It also means building psychologically safe cultures where employees feel confident reporting incidents without fear of blame or retaliation.

Looking Ahead

Technology will keep evolving, and unfortunately, so will the ways it can be misused. Organisations that treat Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence as just another cyber-risk line item,  rather than as the new frontier of gender-based violence,  risk missing its very real human consequences.

This is more than compliance. It’s about protecting people’s dignity, safeguarding psychological safety, maintaining trust, and ensuring that innovation doesn’t come at the expense of employee wellbeing. Workplace safety in 2026 no longer means just what happens in the office, but what happens on a screen, too.

Does your harassment policy cover deepfakes, nudification and AI-enabled abuse? Explore our AI Harassment & Digital Safety at Work workshop

Schedule a no obligation strategy    to find out what  ourworkshops cover, how they can be delivered  and tailored to your organisation’s risk profile.


    Written by

    Dorothy Dalton
    Dorothy Dalton
    Dorothy Dalton is Founder of 3Plus International a specialist HR consulting organisation focusing on designing inclusive workplaces. She supports organizations to achieve business success and individuals to reach their potential. She is CIPD qualified, a Certified Trainer and multi-disciplinary Coach, including Trauma Informed Practices. She is a Certified ISO 45003 Practitioner (Psychosocial Safety)

    Related Posts

    AI Is Rewriting the Rules of Work - Is Your Organisation Ready?

    AI Is Rewriting the Rules of Work - Is Your Organisation Ready?

    Artificial intelligence has moved from the edges of HR into its core. It now touches who gets hired, who gets promoted, who gets let go, and how employees experience the workplace day to day. That shift creates real opportunity,  faster

    Published on: August 28, 2026

    20 Examples Of Non-Inclusive Behaviours In An AI-Enabled Workplace

    20 Examples Of Non-Inclusive Behaviours In An AI-Enabled Workplace

    What happens when old workplace biases meet new AI technologies? Here are 20 examples of non-inclusive behaviours. AI is revolutionising our workplaces at a pace we are struggling to keep up with. But coming at the same time and speed

    Published on: August 20, 2026

    The Gender Feedback Gap. When Kind Isn't Fair

    The Gender Feedback Gap. When Kind Isn't Fair

    What is the gender feedback gap? When does being kind become unfair? Ambitious people are always told they need feedback to grow. But what happens when the feedback women receive is vague and unactionable, leaving them with little concrete to

    Published on: August 10, 2026